My Stuff

2010 Conferences

OSGi DevCon @ JAX London

February 23 - Keynote titled OSGi in the Enterprise: Agility, Modularity, and Architecture’s Paradox

EclipseCon

March 22 - 25 - Tutorial on Modular Architecture

Über Conf

June 14 - 17 - Sessions titled Turtles and Architecture and Patterns of Modular Architecture

Catalyst

July 26 - 30 - Two sessions on rich mobile applications and one on agile development. Half day tutorial on software process improvement.

Tweets @ Twitter

Apple's profits for its latest quarter are $1 billion. That's $1 billion per week, by the way. http://t.co/wE6RglA5 1 week ago

If you know JavaScript and HTML, you can crete your own custom widgets in iBooks Author. That's pretty cool…#Apple 2 weeks ago

High School Textbooks also available. Major publishers are on board. Several volumes available today…#Apple 2 weeks ago

#Apple announces iBooks Author for OS X and iBooks 2. Using author, you can create your own interactive books for iBooks. 2 weeks ago

Nice #HTML5 site (html5rocks.com). Check out the Interactive Presentation & HTML5 vs. native comparison (http://t.co/UFTuafAE) via @mahemoff 2 weeks ago

LinkedIn Profile

The opinions expressed on this site are my own, and not necessarily those of my employer.

The Enterprise is Broken

Filed Under Agile, Development |  

To only a fraction of the human race does God give the privilege of
earning one’s bread doing what one would have gladly pursued free, for
passion.

- Frederick Brooks in The Mythical Man Month

I like that quote. But let me ask…

How many software developers have a strong desire to develop enterprise business applications? How many dream of working for banks, insurance companies, automobile manufacturers, retail chains, etc? These are places we start, not places we dream of. In general, developers do not aspire to develop enterprise software, but instead develop enterprise software while they aspire to do other things. Frankly, the jobs are boring, painful, arduous, and do not challenge. The enterprise is broken. Michael Nygard touches on this in explaining why enterprise applications suck.

So how do we fix it? To do great things, you have to learn to love the process. If you want to grow a beautiful garden, you have to learn to enjoy pulling weeds. If you want to build a beautiful courtyard, you have to learn to love landscaping. If you want to paint a masterpiece, you have to learn to love the stroke of the brush. It isn’t enough to just plant the seeds. It isn’t enough to just move dirt and pile block. It isn’t enough to just apply paint to the canvas. Likewise, if you want to develop great enterprise software, you have to learn to love the process. Fixing the enterprise demands that we first fix the process.

There are a lot of suggested ways to do this. Scrum. XP. Lean. CMMI. The list goes on. But the right process - the ideal process - is a product of people, culture, technology, project, and more. There is no one-size-fits-all process. Every project is different. Every team is different. Every organization is different. What should we do? How do we fix the process? The only way to fix it is to learn to love it.

Comments

2 Responses to “The Enterprise is Broken”

  1. Dew Drop - May 22, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew on May 22nd, 2009 12:46 pm

    [...] The Enterprise is Broken (Kirk Knoernschild) [...]

  2. Todd Biske on May 22nd, 2009 6:03 pm

    Great post, and I’d like to add another point. There’s a difference between developing technology and applying technology. If you career interests lie more with developing technology, the typical corporate enterprise may not be the best place for you. While most organizations have some internal development, it’s always going to be a subset of the overall software development space, and certainly much smaller than what a company whose business is software development would do. If, however, you’re interested in applying technology, software development may be interesting, but ultimately, it’s the application of that technology to a business problem, whether it’s off the shelf or built in-house, that drives your job satisfaction, at least from a core responsibilities. Personally, I fall into the latter category, which is why the enterprise world has been such a good fit for me. I know plenty of people who are more interested in the technology, and they bounce around from company to company, based upon their ability to work with the technologies they’re interested in. There’s nothing wrong with either. Enterprises need people with both approaches to be successful. Some may have 30 or 40 year careers, others may have 3 to 4. The most important thing to understand is what your own career aspirations are, and make appropriate decisions. If you’re a technology guy, but are envisioning a 40 year career with one company, you’d better make sure it’s a technology company.

Leave a Reply